top of page

“Screen Grid vs Solid Wall: Which ICF Insulates Better? The Real Thermal Performance Behind ICF México Systems”

ICF (Insulating Concrete Forms) is known worldwide for delivering energy efficiency, comfort, and exceptional structural performance. In Mexico, two ICF wall configurations dominate the market:

  • Screen Grid ICF (post & beam) — ICF-15 and ICF-20

  • Solid Wall ICF (monolithic core) — StrongWall

Both deliver outstanding thermal insulation, but each behaves differently due to concrete distribution and thermal mass.

Let’s break down how each system insulates and which one is best for every type of project.


1. How Thermal Insulation Works in ICF

In ICF construction, the majority of the insulation comes from EPS foam—not from the concrete.Concrete contributes structural performance and thermal mass, while EPS:

  • Reduces heat transfer

  • Eliminates thermal bridging

  • Maintains stable indoor temperatures

  • Reduces HVAC energy consumption by up to 50%

This means both systems offer elite insulation, though their thermal behavior varies by mass and continuity.


ree

2. Screen Grid ICF (ICF-15 & ICF-20): Maximum Insulation with Lower Thermal Mass

Screen Grid ICF uses:

  • Reinforced concrete cores (vertical + horizontal)

  • Large sections of uninterrupted EPS

  • Complete thermal bridge elimination


R-Values (Mexico):

  • ICF-15 → R-17+

  • ICF-20 → R-26+


Thermal Advantages

  • High percentage of EPS → extremely low heat transfer

  • No continuous concrete path

  • Better performance in hot climates

  • Lower conduction compared to solid systems

Perfect for warm regions and residential projects.



ree

3. Solid Wall ICF: Maximum Thermal Mass + Continuous Insulation

Solid Wall ICF features:

  • A 100% continuous monolithic concrete core

  • EPS layers on both sides ensuring uninterrupted insulation


R-Values (by core thickness):

  • 4” → R-22

  • 5.5” → R-24

  • 7.5” → R-26


Thermal Advantages

  • Extremely high thermal mass

  • Superior thermal lag (delay in heat flow)

  • Exceptional interior stability

  • Best for buildings with internal heat loads

Ideal for hotels, offices, warehouses, and mixed-climate regions.


4. Side-by-Side Comparison

Feature

Screen Grid (ICF-15 / ICF-20)

Solid Wall (StrongWall)

R-Value

R-17+ to R-26+

R-22 to R-26

Thermal Mass

Medium

Very high

Thermal Bridges

Zero

Zero

Thermal Lag

Excellent

Superior

Hot Climate Comfort

🔥 Best

Very high

Mixed or Cold Nights

High

🔥 Best

Cost per m²

Lower

Higher

Typical Use

Homes & mid-rise buildings

Hotels, hospitals, industrial


5. Which One Should You Choose?

Best cost-to-performance ratio → Screen Grid

Highest insulation for the investment.

Best thermal stability + mass → Solid Wall

Superior for demanding commercial environments.


Conclusion

Both systems deliver exceptional energy efficiency far beyond traditional masonry.Your choice depends on:

  • Climate

  • Building use

  • Desired thermal mass

  • Budget

  • Operational goals

Screen Grid and Solid Wall ICF from ICF México are both world-class solutions for modern, efficient, high-performance construction.




 
 
 

Comments


bottom of page